- If you are considering using linear regression for ordinal outcomes, consider y* standardized coefficients from the ordinal model as an alternative
- Unlike multinomial logit, only requires estimating J – 2 more parameters than linear regression (for the thresholds τ). So, relatively efficient model
- Before using ordinal models, consider:
- Is there a clear y* latent metric underlying the observed categories of your dependent variable? If not, ordinal models may not be the best choice
- If yes, and the latent y* is of substantive interest, the ordinal model can greatly simplify interpretation
- Whether your DV is ordinal as Stevens defined it:
- Categories are ranked on a single dimension
- Consider whether the relationship between your predictor and outcome variable is likely ordered in nature
- If either (b) or (c) are violated, the ordinal model can lead to biased conclusions
- Even if you think (c) is likely to hold, always do a sensitivity analysis using a nominal model before accepting the results of an ordinal model
Extensions of the ordinal model
- Even if you don’t use the ordinal model much in your work, it is the foundation for other useful models. E.g.,
- Graded response item response theory (IRT) models are based on ordinal logit
- The y* derivation of the ordinal model is used for the derivation of nonlinear factor analysis models for ordinal items
- These are methods used to scale continuous latent variables from ordinal observed items
- More appropriate than factor analysis (which assume interval level latent variables and interval level items)
- Both IRT and nonlinear factor analysis (actually the same underlying model) are very useful scaling techniques
Back to top